One misconception is that the musician needs to be a "starving artist" and live a poor lifestyle. Music, just like any other profession, has those who succeed financially and people who do not and people in between. You see wealthy pop and rock stars and also you see buskers with jars on the street. Monetary success is impartial of expertise, and not essentially specific to anybody business either.
An fascinating thing to note is that music itself is actually a relatively expensive industry so far as skilled musicians are concerned. Instruments and different tools plus their maintenance and likewise spaces can be quite costly. Quality lessons, a crucial investment, will not be precisely cheap. All companies have their overhead and working expenses. And doing music vocationally falls into this category, due to this fact it requires proper business acumen and excellent financial planning to make sure solvency and viability. And there are actually skilled musicians in this world who aren't "starving" and doing just fine.
Another false concept is that musicians should be somewhat loopy or unstable, and this has by some means develop into related to talent. Talent stands alone and is its own area.
Oppressive individuals created this false notion in an effort to maintain creativity down. Anything good, powerful and inventive threatens sure individuals whose only intention is to destroy. This, therobsky by the way, explains the prevalence of drugs in rock music. It is all calculated. Musicians, because they are creative and inventive, are vulnerable and often targets for suppression.
Musicians, like another human being, have emotions and feelings. Because they are under more judgement and analysis, corresponding to throughout competitions or academic jury exams, they turn out to be more liable to assaults by those who use that as an avenue primarily to hurt others, or by those that are merely insensitive. Contradictory evaluations between judges may cause nice confusion.
Being expressive, joyful, insouciant and humorous can all come under the heading of creativity, so this too has additionally been falsely related to being crazy or neurotic.
Being fairly uninhibited is mostly frowned upon in our society, the place we're all expected to behave in a sure method, like cattle. When a musician is in a transcendental second, he could seem somewhat crazy to a more unusual person. A real instance was a composer who was walking down the street and unexpectedly had a spark of creativity and he started "thinking out loud" with his creative process, making rhythmic hand and body gestures. Some passersby might have thought there was something flawed with him, not understanding that he was merely having a transcendental or creative moment.
One widespread fallacy is that it's someway okay for a musician to play for free. The "pay to play" concept is unfortunately prevalent. Would one ask a plumber to return fix the sink free of charge? Not if he desires to get his sink fixed. Consider it or not, an ad was placed recently in a sure classifieds part from a restaurant proprietor looking for a band to come carry out at his restaurant for free with the inadequate exchange of "selling themselves and promoting albums". As foolish as this sounds, it is all too common. Music instructors frequently get requested totally free lessons. While there is nothing flawed with doing volunteer work to help deserving underprivileged individuals, that is different. Would one ask an accountant to do taxes at no cost? Once more, identical principle.
Another flawed thought about musicians is that their physical appearance, conduct or demeanor needs to be uncommon, completely different and even weird. This gets imposed rather a lot but is unnecessary. It's an incorrect behavior in many societies. Image is image and irrelevant to demonstration of talent.